English
Русский 27-42 p.
The surface and micelle-forming properties of two surface-active sugar derivatives and their binary mixtures were studied: dipotassium glycyrrhizinate, which is an anionic surfactant of natural origin (saponin) and has biologically active properties, and a nonionic sugar surfactant decyl glycoside. Decyl glycoside has a noticeably higher surface activity and a noticeably lower CMC value than dipotassium glycyrrhizinate. Using Rubin's equations, the composition of mixed micelles and the parameters of surfactant interaction in them were calculated. It has been shown that a synergistic effect is observed in aqueous solutions of binary mixtures of these surfactants. Due to this, dipotassium glycyrrhizinate can be used together with decyl glycoside as a base for foaming solutions for cosmetic, pharmaceutical and medical foams. Using dispersion analysis of foam over time, the stability of foam stabilized with a mixture of dipotassium glycyrrhizinate and decyl glycoside in a molar ratio of 0.2:0.8 and the ef-fect on the stability of foam of the addition of two different biopolymers: polysaccharide - xanthan (xanthan gum) and protein - keratin of sheep wool hydrolyzate were studied. Based on dispersion analysis of foam micrographs, it was shown that both polymers increase the durability of the foam over time. Foam containing xanthan breaks down primarily through Ostwald ripening rather than coalescence. Foam with keratin hydrolyzate has a lower initial dispersion and number of bubbles than foam with keratin hydrolyzate. The stability of both foams is close, but slightly higher in the case of the addition of keratin.
1. Hoc D., Haznar-Garbacz D. Foams as unique drug delivery systems. European J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2021. Vol. 167. P. 73 – 82.
2. Chiara G.M.G., Selmin F., Minghetti P., Cilurzo F. Medicated foams and film forming dosage forms as tools to improve the thermodynamic activity of drugs to be administered though the skin. 2019. Vol. 16 (5). P. 461 – 471.
3. Falusi F., Budai-Szucs M. Csanyi E., Berko S., Spaits T.,Csoka I., Kovacs S. Investigation of the effect of polymers on dermal foam properties using the QbD approach. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2022. Vol. 173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejps.2022.106160
4. Purdon C.H., Haigh J.M., Surber C., Smith E.W. Foam drug delivery in dermatology. Am. J. Drug Delivery. 2003. Vol. 1. P. 71 – 75.
5. Tamarkin D., Friedman D., Shemer A. Emolient foam in topical drug delivery. Expert Opin. Drug Delivery. 2006. Vol. 3 (6). P. 799 – 807.
6. Shinde N.G., Aloorkar N.H., Bangar B.N., Deshmukh S.M., Shirke M.V., Kale B.B. Pharmaceutical foam drug delivery system: general considerations. Indo American J. Pharm. Res. 2013. Vol. 3 (12). P. 1322 – 1327.
7. Shemer A., Sakka N., Tamarkin D. Betamethasone valerate foam: look at the clinical data. Clinical Trial Out-comes. 2014. Vol. 4 (33). P. 259 – 267.
8. Arzhavitina A., Steckel H. Foams for pharmaceutical and cosmetic applications. Int. J. Pharm. 2010. Vol. 394. P. 1 – 17.
9. Tang C., Xiao E., Sinko P.J., Szekely Z., Prud’homme R.K. Responsive foams for nanoparticle delivery. Col-loids Surfaces B Biointerfaces. 2015. Vol. 133. P. 81 – 87.
10. Cooper A., Vance S.J., Brian O., Smith B.O., Kennedy M.W. Frog foams and natural protein surfactants. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects. 2017. Vol. 534. P. 120 – 129.
11. Kumar M., Thakur A., Mandal U.K.,Thakur A., Bhatia A. Foam-based drug delivery: a newer approach for Pharmaceutical dossage form. AAPS Pharm. Sci. Tech. 2022. Vol. 23 (7). DOI:10.1208/s12249-022-02390-x
12. Schubert J., Khosrawipour T., Khosrawipour V., Arafkas M., Martino A., Bania J., Pieczka M., Pigaz-zi A., Hhosrawipour V. The concept of foam as a drug carrier for intraperitoneal chemotherapy, feasibility, cyclotoxity and characteristics. Sci Rep. 2019. Vol. 10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-67236-7
13. Hadzhieva Z.D., Andreeva I.N., Pantjuhin A.V. Tehnologija pennyh vann dlja ispol'zovanija v bal'neolog-icheskoj praktike. Nauchnye vedomosti BelGU. Farm. med. 2010. № 22. C. 55 – 57.
14. Tighchi H.A., Kayhani M.H., Faezian A., Yeganehzad S., Miller R. Dynamic interfacial properties and foam behaviour of licorice root extract solutions. Colloids Surf. B. Biointerfaces. 2023. Vol. 224. P. 113181.
15. Chauhan S., Gulati N., Nagaich U. Glycyrrhizic acid: extraction, screening and evalution of anti- -n-fammatory property. Ars. Pharm. 2018. Vol. 59 (2). P. 61 – 67.
16. Holmberg K., Jjonsson B., Kronberg B., Lindman B. Poverhnostno-aktivnye veshhestva i polimery v vodnyh rastvorah: per. s angl. M.: BINOM-Laboratorija znanij, 2007. 526 s.
17. Lange K.R. Poverhnostno-aktivnye veshhestva. Sintez, svojstva, analiz, primenenie. S.-Pb.: Professija, 2005. 240 s.
18. Rosen M.J. Surfactants and Interfacial Phenomena. 3rd edn. New York: John Wiley, 2004. 455 pp.
19. Pletnev M.Ju. Kosmetiko-gigienicheskie mojushhie sredstva. M.: Himija, 1990. 272 s.
20. Wiertel-Pochopien A., Batys P., Zawala J., Kowalczuk P.B. Synergistic Effect of Binary Surfactant Mixtures in Two-Phase and Three-Phase Systems. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2021. Vol.125 (15). P. 3855 – 3866.
21. Zawala J, Wiertel-Pochopien A., Kowalczuk P.B. Critical Synergistic Concentration of Binary Surfactant Mixtures. Minerals. 2020. Vol. 10. P. 1 – 10.
22. Kareema S.H.,Sattar B. Adsorption Properties for Aqueous Solution of BinaryMixture of Cocamidopropyl betaine- Sodium dodecyl sulfate Surfactants on Air-Liquid Interface. Int. J. Sci.: Basic and Applied Research. 2015. Vol. 24 (3). P. 50 – 58.
23. Ghosh S., Burman A.D., De G.C., Das A.R. Interfacial and self-aggregation of binary mixtures of anionic and nonionic amphiphiles in aqueous medium. J. Phys Chem. B. 2011. Vol. 115. № 38. P. 11098 – 11112.
24. Micellization in aqueous solutions of mixed surfactants containing alkylpolyglucosides. Colloid J. 2011. Vol. 73 (6). P. 841 – 845.
25. Ruiz C.C. (Ed.) Sugar-Based Surfactants. Fundamentals and Applications. Boca Ration-London-New York: CRC Press,Taylor & Francis Group, 2009. P.640.
26. Sheng Y., Lu, S., Xu M., Wu X., Li C. Effect of xanthan gum on the performance of aqueous film-forming foam. J. Dispersion Sci. Technol. 2016. Vol. 37. P. 1664 – 1670.
27. Jing J. Sun J., Zhang M., Wang C., Xiong X. Preparation and rheological properties of a stable aqueous foam system. RSC Adv. 2017. Vol. 7. P. 39258 – 39269.
28. Erasov V.S., Pletnev M.Y., Pokidko B.V. Stability and rheology of foams containing microbial poly-sachcharide and particles of silica and bentonite clay. Colloid J. 2015. Vol. 77 (5). P. 614 – 621.
29. Erasov V.S., Pletnev M.Y., Pokidko B.V. Features of aqueous polymer-stabilized foams particularly con-taining bentonite particles. J. Dispersion Sci. Tech. 2020. Vol. 41. P. 101 – 106.
30. Attia J.A., Kholi S., Pilon L. Scaling laws in steady-state aqueous foams including Ostwald ripening. Col-loids Surface A: Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2013. Vol. 436. P. 1000 – 1006.
2. Chiara G.M.G., Selmin F., Minghetti P., Cilurzo F. Medicated foams and film forming dosage forms as tools to improve the thermodynamic activity of drugs to be administered though the skin. 2019. Vol. 16 (5). P. 461 – 471.
3. Falusi F., Budai-Szucs M. Csanyi E., Berko S., Spaits T.,Csoka I., Kovacs S. Investigation of the effect of polymers on dermal foam properties using the QbD approach. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2022. Vol. 173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejps.2022.106160
4. Purdon C.H., Haigh J.M., Surber C., Smith E.W. Foam drug delivery in dermatology. Am. J. Drug Delivery. 2003. Vol. 1. P. 71 – 75.
5. Tamarkin D., Friedman D., Shemer A. Emolient foam in topical drug delivery. Expert Opin. Drug Delivery. 2006. Vol. 3 (6). P. 799 – 807.
6. Shinde N.G., Aloorkar N.H., Bangar B.N., Deshmukh S.M., Shirke M.V., Kale B.B. Pharmaceutical foam drug delivery system: general considerations. Indo American J. Pharm. Res. 2013. Vol. 3 (12). P. 1322 – 1327.
7. Shemer A., Sakka N., Tamarkin D. Betamethasone valerate foam: look at the clinical data. Clinical Trial Out-comes. 2014. Vol. 4 (33). P. 259 – 267.
8. Arzhavitina A., Steckel H. Foams for pharmaceutical and cosmetic applications. Int. J. Pharm. 2010. Vol. 394. P. 1 – 17.
9. Tang C., Xiao E., Sinko P.J., Szekely Z., Prud’homme R.K. Responsive foams for nanoparticle delivery. Col-loids Surfaces B Biointerfaces. 2015. Vol. 133. P. 81 – 87.
10. Cooper A., Vance S.J., Brian O., Smith B.O., Kennedy M.W. Frog foams and natural protein surfactants. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects. 2017. Vol. 534. P. 120 – 129.
11. Kumar M., Thakur A., Mandal U.K.,Thakur A., Bhatia A. Foam-based drug delivery: a newer approach for Pharmaceutical dossage form. AAPS Pharm. Sci. Tech. 2022. Vol. 23 (7). DOI:10.1208/s12249-022-02390-x
12. Schubert J., Khosrawipour T., Khosrawipour V., Arafkas M., Martino A., Bania J., Pieczka M., Pigaz-zi A., Hhosrawipour V. The concept of foam as a drug carrier for intraperitoneal chemotherapy, feasibility, cyclotoxity and characteristics. Sci Rep. 2019. Vol. 10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-67236-7
13. Hadzhieva Z.D., Andreeva I.N., Pantjuhin A.V. Tehnologija pennyh vann dlja ispol'zovanija v bal'neolog-icheskoj praktike. Nauchnye vedomosti BelGU. Farm. med. 2010. № 22. C. 55 – 57.
14. Tighchi H.A., Kayhani M.H., Faezian A., Yeganehzad S., Miller R. Dynamic interfacial properties and foam behaviour of licorice root extract solutions. Colloids Surf. B. Biointerfaces. 2023. Vol. 224. P. 113181.
15. Chauhan S., Gulati N., Nagaich U. Glycyrrhizic acid: extraction, screening and evalution of anti- -n-fammatory property. Ars. Pharm. 2018. Vol. 59 (2). P. 61 – 67.
16. Holmberg K., Jjonsson B., Kronberg B., Lindman B. Poverhnostno-aktivnye veshhestva i polimery v vodnyh rastvorah: per. s angl. M.: BINOM-Laboratorija znanij, 2007. 526 s.
17. Lange K.R. Poverhnostno-aktivnye veshhestva. Sintez, svojstva, analiz, primenenie. S.-Pb.: Professija, 2005. 240 s.
18. Rosen M.J. Surfactants and Interfacial Phenomena. 3rd edn. New York: John Wiley, 2004. 455 pp.
19. Pletnev M.Ju. Kosmetiko-gigienicheskie mojushhie sredstva. M.: Himija, 1990. 272 s.
20. Wiertel-Pochopien A., Batys P., Zawala J., Kowalczuk P.B. Synergistic Effect of Binary Surfactant Mixtures in Two-Phase and Three-Phase Systems. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2021. Vol.125 (15). P. 3855 – 3866.
21. Zawala J, Wiertel-Pochopien A., Kowalczuk P.B. Critical Synergistic Concentration of Binary Surfactant Mixtures. Minerals. 2020. Vol. 10. P. 1 – 10.
22. Kareema S.H.,Sattar B. Adsorption Properties for Aqueous Solution of BinaryMixture of Cocamidopropyl betaine- Sodium dodecyl sulfate Surfactants on Air-Liquid Interface. Int. J. Sci.: Basic and Applied Research. 2015. Vol. 24 (3). P. 50 – 58.
23. Ghosh S., Burman A.D., De G.C., Das A.R. Interfacial and self-aggregation of binary mixtures of anionic and nonionic amphiphiles in aqueous medium. J. Phys Chem. B. 2011. Vol. 115. № 38. P. 11098 – 11112.
24. Micellization in aqueous solutions of mixed surfactants containing alkylpolyglucosides. Colloid J. 2011. Vol. 73 (6). P. 841 – 845.
25. Ruiz C.C. (Ed.) Sugar-Based Surfactants. Fundamentals and Applications. Boca Ration-London-New York: CRC Press,Taylor & Francis Group, 2009. P.640.
26. Sheng Y., Lu, S., Xu M., Wu X., Li C. Effect of xanthan gum on the performance of aqueous film-forming foam. J. Dispersion Sci. Technol. 2016. Vol. 37. P. 1664 – 1670.
27. Jing J. Sun J., Zhang M., Wang C., Xiong X. Preparation and rheological properties of a stable aqueous foam system. RSC Adv. 2017. Vol. 7. P. 39258 – 39269.
28. Erasov V.S., Pletnev M.Y., Pokidko B.V. Stability and rheology of foams containing microbial poly-sachcharide and particles of silica and bentonite clay. Colloid J. 2015. Vol. 77 (5). P. 614 – 621.
29. Erasov V.S., Pletnev M.Y., Pokidko B.V. Features of aqueous polymer-stabilized foams particularly con-taining bentonite particles. J. Dispersion Sci. Tech. 2020. Vol. 41. P. 101 – 106.
30. Attia J.A., Kholi S., Pilon L. Scaling laws in steady-state aqueous foams including Ostwald ripening. Col-loids Surface A: Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2013. Vol. 436. P. 1000 – 1006.
Erasov V.S., Maltseva Yu.O. Surface-active and micelle-forming properties of binary mixtures of glycyrrhizin and decyl glycoside and stabilization of foam stabilized by such a mixture with xanthan and keratin additives. Chemical Bulletin. 2023. 6 (4). P. 27 – 42.